<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Norway Is Leading the Way in DAB Radio	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bestradios.co.uk/how-norway-is-leading-the-way-in-dab-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bestradios.co.uk/how-norway-is-leading-the-way-in-dab-radio/</link>
	<description>Reviews of the best radios available in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 14:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Knut Sand		</title>
		<link>https://bestradios.co.uk/how-norway-is-leading-the-way-in-dab-radio/#comment-3246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knut Sand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bestradios.co.uk/?p=888#comment-3246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Knut Sand: Radio listening in Norway is (13.10.2017) down by 12-18%. Somehow they consider this a success. Some channels are down 50%. Winners so far seem to be local radios still transmitting on FM.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knut Sand: Radio listening in Norway is (13.10.2017) down by 12-18%. Somehow they consider this a success. Some channels are down 50%. Winners so far seem to be local radios still transmitting on FM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ola Nordmann		</title>
		<link>https://bestradios.co.uk/how-norway-is-leading-the-way-in-dab-radio/#comment-156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ola Nordmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bestradios.co.uk/?p=888#comment-156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Norway has a very challenging topography with a lot of mountains and islands. To keep both FM and DAB running would require lots of transmitters, which would cost 200 million Kronor (about £20 million) a year extra according to NRK.&quot; They&#039;re saving money by lowering the percentage of radio cover, removing it from places like mountains and national parks. Supposedly saves some tax payer money. Shame most of those places don&#039;t have phone coverage either to check weather forecasts. 

&quot;Also, since the majority of Norwegian households already had a digital radio and DAB was becoming the more common way of listening to the radio, it was considered a good time to simplify things and bring costs down by switching off FM.&quot;
Complete and utter bullshit. DAB(+) was never a major way of listening to the radio before they decided to shut down FM. They never reached their goal of getting 50% of the population listening to DAB before shutting down FM. With weeks left of their experiment to get people over to DAB they saw that there was simply no way to get half the population to spend £100 to get worse radio, so they changed to rules from &quot;shut down FM when 50% listens to DAB&quot; to &quot;shut down FM when 50% have tried non-FM radio including but not limited to streaming, DAB/DAB+ and satellite radio&quot;.

Most people still don&#039;t have DAB, because the coverage sucks when you get outside of dense population. I drove from my moms apartment to her summer house, in a rental car with DAB, just before they shut down FM in her area. I lost FM coverage twice for just a few seconds each time, but lost DAB over 30 times, sometimes for minutes at a time, during a 90 minute drive. I&#039;ve tried to get DAB working on my mothers £500 stereo as well, but brick walls seem to block all the DAB signals. She ended up replacing FM with internet streaming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Norway has a very challenging topography with a lot of mountains and islands. To keep both FM and DAB running would require lots of transmitters, which would cost 200 million Kronor (about £20 million) a year extra according to NRK.&#8221; They&#8217;re saving money by lowering the percentage of radio cover, removing it from places like mountains and national parks. Supposedly saves some tax payer money. Shame most of those places don&#8217;t have phone coverage either to check weather forecasts. </p>
<p>&#8220;Also, since the majority of Norwegian households already had a digital radio and DAB was becoming the more common way of listening to the radio, it was considered a good time to simplify things and bring costs down by switching off FM.&#8221;<br />
Complete and utter bullshit. DAB(+) was never a major way of listening to the radio before they decided to shut down FM. They never reached their goal of getting 50% of the population listening to DAB before shutting down FM. With weeks left of their experiment to get people over to DAB they saw that there was simply no way to get half the population to spend £100 to get worse radio, so they changed to rules from &#8220;shut down FM when 50% listens to DAB&#8221; to &#8220;shut down FM when 50% have tried non-FM radio including but not limited to streaming, DAB/DAB+ and satellite radio&#8221;.</p>
<p>Most people still don&#8217;t have DAB, because the coverage sucks when you get outside of dense population. I drove from my moms apartment to her summer house, in a rental car with DAB, just before they shut down FM in her area. I lost FM coverage twice for just a few seconds each time, but lost DAB over 30 times, sometimes for minutes at a time, during a 90 minute drive. I&#8217;ve tried to get DAB working on my mothers £500 stereo as well, but brick walls seem to block all the DAB signals. She ended up replacing FM with internet streaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
